Download An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United by Social Science Research Council, National Research Council, PDF

By Social Science Research Council, National Research Council, American Council on Education, American Council of Learned Sciences, Committee on an Assessment of Quality-Related Characteristics of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States

ISBN-10: 0309032997

ISBN-13: 9780309032995

Show description

enter Read or Download An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Mathematical and Physical Sciences PDF

follow site Best higher & continuing education books

APL and the Bilingual Learner

Evaluation and Accreditation of previous studying structures are actually conventional in schools to open up entry for capability scholars via harnessing their earlier studying, wisdom and talents. yet one significant factor, language and literacy, has now not but been thoroughly addressed, and our schooling procedure nonetheless offers many boundaries for non-native audio system of English.

Building Teaching Capacities in Higher Education: A Comprehensive International Model

This ebook is the fruits of 3 years’ paintings through groups from 8 associations in 5 diverse ecu and North American nations. The groups incorporated school builders, professors, and graduate scholars drawn to constructing and disseminating a extra profound figuring out of university-level pedagogy.

International Perspectives on Teachers and Lecturers in Technical and Vocational Education

This publication offers perception into the historical past and present prestige of training in technical and vocational schooling throughout a extensive variety of nations. It includes experiences of the profiles of lecturers and teachers and their academic practices in: Germany, Brazil, Denmark, China, France, Japan, Norway, Turkey, the united kingdom and the united states.

Adult Education, Museums and Art Galleries: Animating Social, Cultural and Institutional Change

This can be a booklet approximately grownup schooling within the sphere of public museums and artwork galleries. It goals to complement and extend discussion and realizing among grownup and group educators, curators, artists, administrators, and cultural activists who paintings inside and past the partitions of those associations. some of the chapters soak up the advanced and interconnected pedagogics of subjectivity, identification, which means making and interpretation, wisdom, authority, prescription, innovation, and creativity.

Extra info for An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Mathematical and Physical Sciences

Sample text

2 NA NA 852 29 26 34 42 009. 12 NA 39 38 45 38 33 010. 00 NA 38 37 40 38 27 011. 4 012. 46 742 45 45 46 46 46 49 41 013. 6 014. 1 015. 57 1036 54 54 41 50 39 54 44 016. 5 NA NA NA 36 35 39 41 017. 32 NA 48 46 43 44 43 018. 82 5297 74 73 56 73 66 80 019. 65 3717 020. 03 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean=50 and standard deviation=10. “NA” indicates that the value for a measure is not available.

Over the past 10 years increasing numbers of doctoral recipients have taken positions outside the academic setting. 2: An average of 40 percent of the recent graduates in the mathematical and physical science disciplines who had definite employment plans indicated that they planned to take positions in nonacademic settings. Data from another NRC survey suggest that the actual fraction of scientists employed outside academia may be significantly higher. The committee recognized that the inclusion of nonacademic evaluators would furnish information valuable for assessing nontraditional dimensions of doctoral education and would provide an important new measure not assessed in earlier studies.

NSF 81–301, 1981. , using source files provided by the Institute for Scientific Information. 23Francis Narin, Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publications and Citations Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity, Report to the National Science Foundation, March 1976, p. 203. About this PDF file: This new digital representation of the original work has been recomposed from XML files created from the original paper book, not from the original typesetting files. Page breaks are true to the original; line lengths, word breaks, heading styles, and other typesetting-specific formatting, however, cannot be retained, and some typographic errors may have been accidentally inserted.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.10 of 5 – based on 16 votes